<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Kate Winslet not good enough for HDTV?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ayyyy.com/2007/09/24/kate-winslet-not-good-enough-for-hdtv/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ayyyy.com/2007/09/24/kate-winslet-not-good-enough-for-hdtv/</link>
	<description>Gently Making Fun of the Famous</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 03:14:52 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: lance Winebarger</title>
		<link>http://ayyyy.com/2007/09/24/kate-winslet-not-good-enough-for-hdtv/comment-page-1/#comment-63038</link>
		<dc:creator>lance Winebarger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 14:26:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ayyyy.com/2007/09/24/kate-winslet-not-good-enough-for-hdtv/#comment-63038</guid>
		<description>This kind of thing really ticks me off.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This kind of thing really ticks me off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chad</title>
		<link>http://ayyyy.com/2007/09/24/kate-winslet-not-good-enough-for-hdtv/comment-page-1/#comment-60280</link>
		<dc:creator>Chad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 01:51:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ayyyy.com/2007/09/24/kate-winslet-not-good-enough-for-hdtv/#comment-60280</guid>
		<description>Intresting, I never knew that before  thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Intresting, I never knew that before  thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anonymous</title>
		<link>http://ayyyy.com/2007/09/24/kate-winslet-not-good-enough-for-hdtv/comment-page-1/#comment-22123</link>
		<dc:creator>anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2008 20:39:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ayyyy.com/2007/09/24/kate-winslet-not-good-enough-for-hdtv/#comment-22123</guid>
		<description>kate winslet is very, very flatulent. She farted today. She was really annoying in Titanic- especially in the nude scene of her getting her protrait done. What a smelly slut! kate winslet sucks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>kate winslet is very, very flatulent. She farted today. She was really annoying in Titanic- especially in the nude scene of her getting her protrait done. What a smelly slut! kate winslet sucks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anonymous</title>
		<link>http://ayyyy.com/2007/09/24/kate-winslet-not-good-enough-for-hdtv/comment-page-1/#comment-3577</link>
		<dc:creator>anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 06:08:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ayyyy.com/2007/09/24/kate-winslet-not-good-enough-for-hdtv/#comment-3577</guid>
		<description>Did Kate Winslet look masculine in the Titanic?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did Kate Winslet look masculine in the Titanic?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rachel of Cyberia</title>
		<link>http://ayyyy.com/2007/09/24/kate-winslet-not-good-enough-for-hdtv/comment-page-1/#comment-517</link>
		<dc:creator>Rachel of Cyberia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2007 16:53:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ayyyy.com/2007/09/24/kate-winslet-not-good-enough-for-hdtv/#comment-517</guid>
		<description>Men with HDTV who watch a lot of pornography on it are disgusted by the fact that women have pores and freckles and arm hair, and other human aberrations. They are demanding &quot;perfect&quot;-looking women to ogle, rather than realizing that women are human (no! it&#039;s true!) and can have imperfections.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Men with HDTV who watch a lot of pornography on it are disgusted by the fact that women have pores and freckles and arm hair, and other human aberrations. They are demanding &#8220;perfect&#8221;-looking women to ogle, rather than realizing that women are human (no! it&#8217;s true!) and can have imperfections.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JUST SAYIN</title>
		<link>http://ayyyy.com/2007/09/24/kate-winslet-not-good-enough-for-hdtv/comment-page-1/#comment-486</link>
		<dc:creator>JUST SAYIN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2007 01:38:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ayyyy.com/2007/09/24/kate-winslet-not-good-enough-for-hdtv/#comment-486</guid>
		<description>WELL, SHE DOES LOOK MUCH OLDER THAN 32 AND THAT PIC UP THERE IS NOT EVEN A CLOSE UP HQ PIC.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WELL, SHE DOES LOOK MUCH OLDER THAN 32 AND THAT PIC UP THERE IS NOT EVEN A CLOSE UP HQ PIC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shiloh</title>
		<link>http://ayyyy.com/2007/09/24/kate-winslet-not-good-enough-for-hdtv/comment-page-1/#comment-451</link>
		<dc:creator>shiloh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 14:58:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ayyyy.com/2007/09/24/kate-winslet-not-good-enough-for-hdtv/#comment-451</guid>
		<description>Kate Winslet - manly? Whoever wrote this should take a long hard look at his/her face in full daylight, before casting the first stone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kate Winslet &#8211; manly? Whoever wrote this should take a long hard look at his/her face in full daylight, before casting the first stone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Agent Bedhead</title>
		<link>http://ayyyy.com/2007/09/24/kate-winslet-not-good-enough-for-hdtv/comment-page-1/#comment-448</link>
		<dc:creator>Agent Bedhead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 07:15:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ayyyy.com/2007/09/24/kate-winslet-not-good-enough-for-hdtv/#comment-448</guid>
		<description>[...] Kate Winslet gets no love from HDTV. (Ayyyy!) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Kate Winslet gets no love from HDTV. (Ayyyy!) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ninjarina</title>
		<link>http://ayyyy.com/2007/09/24/kate-winslet-not-good-enough-for-hdtv/comment-page-1/#comment-436</link>
		<dc:creator>Ninjarina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 23:27:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ayyyy.com/2007/09/24/kate-winslet-not-good-enough-for-hdtv/#comment-436</guid>
		<description>Preposterous!

Everyone knows that the only reason to get HDTV is to watch BBC&#039;s Planet Earth/Blue Planet documentaries!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Preposterous!</p>
<p>Everyone knows that the only reason to get HDTV is to watch BBC&#8217;s Planet Earth/Blue Planet documentaries!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Meg Q</title>
		<link>http://ayyyy.com/2007/09/24/kate-winslet-not-good-enough-for-hdtv/comment-page-1/#comment-432</link>
		<dc:creator>Meg Q</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 22:30:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ayyyy.com/2007/09/24/kate-winslet-not-good-enough-for-hdtv/#comment-432</guid>
		<description>Note to self:

Keep putting off getting an HD TV.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Note to self:</p>
<p>Keep putting off getting an HD TV.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.453 seconds -->
