Decision time: Maggie Gyllenhaal or Kate Walsh
By Spirit Fingers
At some point in all our lives, everyone will encounter this age old dilemma – whether to wear something that looks vastly better from the back than the front, or vice versa. If push came to shove, which way would you swing?
July 22nd, 2008 at 12:58 pm
Forget the outfit, I want to get my hands on Maggie Gyllenhaal, and have her do something with that ugly freaking hairstyle she insists on wearing. It hovers somewhere between “50’s housewife” and “I don’t give a f*ck”, and it just makes me CRAZY!
July 22nd, 2008 at 2:06 pm
Maggie all the way
July 22nd, 2008 at 2:42 pm
KATE for sure. she’s sure of herself and she’s had some rockin outfits l8ly…
July 22nd, 2008 at 10:41 pm
Maggie just looks so much like my grandmother. It freaks me out. But that jumpsuit is fabulous and WAY more practical than most. No wrestling in the stalls when you have to pee in a halter!
July 23rd, 2008 at 10:17 pm
Maggie is fugly. she looks like a soccer mom and she is so self righteous and prissy. everyone knows that the only reason she gets parts is because both her parents are established hollywood players. NEPOTISM. and she can’t act. seriously if she were born to regular joes, maggie would be annoying fat english teacher that everyone suspects is a virgin. and she pretends to be so intellectual but eveyrone knows that she only got in columbia because her dad teaches there. fugly and sanctimonious – yuck.
February 19th, 2010 at 11:19 pm
Kate Walsh is gorgeous. Maggie Gyllenhaal is hideous UGLY. Even with all the plastic surgery she appears to have gotten over the years, she’s still FUGLY as hell