Decision time: Maggie Gyllenhaal or Kate Walsh
At some point in all our lives, everyone will encounter this age old dilemma – whether to wear something that looks vastly better from the back than the front, or vice versa. If push came to shove, which way would you swing?
Forget the outfit, I want to get my hands on Maggie Gyllenhaal, and have her do something with that ugly freaking hairstyle she insists on wearing. It hovers somewhere between “50’s housewife” and “I don’t give a f*ck”, and it just makes me CRAZY!
Maggie all the way
KATE for sure. she’s sure of herself and she’s had some rockin outfits l8ly…
Maggie just looks so much like my grandmother. It freaks me out. But that jumpsuit is fabulous and WAY more practical than most. No wrestling in the stalls when you have to pee in a halter!
Maggie is fugly. she looks like a soccer mom and she is so self righteous and prissy. everyone knows that the only reason she gets parts is because both her parents are established hollywood players. NEPOTISM. and she can’t act. seriously if she were born to regular joes, maggie would be annoying fat english teacher that everyone suspects is a virgin. and she pretends to be so intellectual but eveyrone knows that she only got in columbia because her dad teaches there. fugly and sanctimonious – yuck.
Kate Walsh is gorgeous. Maggie Gyllenhaal is hideous UGLY. Even with all the plastic surgery she appears to have gotten over the years, she’s still FUGLY as hell